Summer Yardley vs Milena Ciocan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Oct at 12:52 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Yardley vs M. Ciocan

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Yardley 1 - 0 Ciocan
They have played 3 sets in total, with Summer Yardley winning 2 and Milena Ciocan winning 1. The last match between Summer Yardley and Milena Ciocan was at the W50 Cherbourg-en-Cotentin, 13-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Summer Yardley getting the victory 6-4 5-7 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Yardley | 1 |
| Ciocan | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W50 Cherbourg-en-Cotentin(10-13-25)
S. Yardley vs M. Ciocan H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 36.44% (43-75) | Career Total W/L | 45.45% (20-24) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Yardley vs M. Ciocan Match Preview:
- How do the players fare on their second serve? Summer Yardley recently won 34.79% of points on their second serve compared to Milena Ciocan's 34.29%.
- Who is better at returning serves lately? Milena Ciocan outperforms Summer Yardley, winning 56.49% of opponent's second serve points, whereas Yardley wins 49.59%.
- Examining first serve returns, Ciocan again holds an edge with 33.89% won, compared to Yardley's 30.86%.
- Under pressure, Ciocan shows resilience by saving 50.35% of breakpoints, compared to Yardley's 45.55%.
- Looking at overall performance, Ciocan has a higher match win percentage over the last year at 50.00% versus Yardley's 41.67%.
- Regarding surface preference, both show a 50% win rate on their best surfaces, Grass for Yardley and I. Hard for Ciocan.
- In terms of competition level, Ciocan has a superior recent win rate of 55.56% at Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, compared to Yardley's 36.36% at Challengers/ITF > $10K.
- Who faces tougher opponents? Yardley, with her recent opponents averaging a rank of 204.19 versus Ciocan's opponents averaging 292.21.
- In deciding sets, Yardley exhibits stronger performance, winning 75% of such matches lately, in contrast to Ciocan's 50%.
Editorial Prediction (October 13, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent performance metrics, Milena Ciocan appears to have a slight edge in several key areas. Her better return game statistics suggest she is more effective at gaining points off her opponents' serves. Additionally, Ciocan demonstrates greater resilience under pressure by saving a higher percentage of breakpoints.
Furthermore, despite facing lower-ranked opponents, Ciocan has capitalized on these opportunities, achieving a better win rate at her competitive level compared to Yardley. On the other hand, Yardley's strength in deciding sets offers her a significant advantage if the match reaches that stage, reflecting her ability to perform under high tension.
Given these insights, with a balanced view of the players' comparative strengths and weaknesses, Milena Ciocan stands as the likely favorite for the upcoming encounter, primarily due to her superior recent performance in several critical areas.
Summer Yardley vs Milena Ciocan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Yardley vs M. Ciocan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 16 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:42:57 | Average Match Time | 2:42:57 |
| 72% (77/107) | 1st Serve % | 60% (65/108) |
| 61% (47/77) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (41/65) |
| 30% (9/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (15/43) |
| 47% (8/17) | Break Pts Won % | 41% (7/17) |
| 48% (52/108) | Return Points Win % | 48% (51/107) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Yardley Recent Matches Played
M. Ciocan Recent Matches Played

S. Yardley vs M. Ciocan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 36.44% (43/75) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.45% (20/24) |
| 38.31% (100/161) | Sets Win/Loss | 45.74% (43/51) |
| 44.35% (1064/1335) | Games Win/Loss | 50.06% (440/439) |
| 32.81% (21/43) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 36.36% (4/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.43% (13/15) |
| 41.46% (17/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.45% (5/6) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 104 | Aces Total | 33 |
| 0.44 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
| 521 | Total Double Faults | 166 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:8:51 |
| 259.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 238.09 |
| 63% (2702/4321) | 1st Serve % | 61% (1282/2106) |
| 58% (1571/2702) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (769/1282) |
| 36% (580/1619) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (345/824) |
| 40% (164/409) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (123/264) |
| 39% (1708/4325) | Return Points Win % | 47% (951/2003) |
| 29.85% (20/47) | Challenger W/L | 35.71% (5/9) |
| 45.10% (23/28) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (15/15) |
| 36% (42/117) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (18/42) |
| 60% (12/20) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 42% (11/26) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (3/8) |
| 82% (45/37) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (23/19) |
| 18% (45/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (23/4) |
| 8% (73/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 5% (21/1) |